{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Rubric"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Rubric","index":0,"n_rows":27,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":27,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[26,0,26,6],[1,2,1,6]]}
["Each committee member will assign a score to each proposal based on the following rubric."]
["Category",null,"Point Break Down",{"$nulls":4},"SCORE"]
["Interest/Anticipated Attendance (25%)"]
[null,"Potential that Speaker/Topic will Attract a Diverse Audience - Content Diversity","Not enough details provided to determine expected audience diversity (0)","Expectation to draw in audience members from only a single program / class / content area (1)","Expectation to draw in audience members from multiple courses / across topics within a single department / discipline (2)","Expectation to draw in audience members from multiple departments / disciplines (3)","Explicit expectation to draw in audience members from multiple disciplines / colleges (4)"]
[null,"Potential that Speaker/Topic will Attract a Diverse Audience - Other Diversity","Not enough details provided to determine expected audience diversity (0)","Expectation to draw in an audience that shares similar demographics or backgrounds (1)","Potential to draw in an audience with varied demographics or backgrounds (2)","Expectation to draw in a multicultural audience (3)","Explicit expectation to draw in a multicultural audience (4)"]
[null,"Potential to Reach a Wide University Audience (expectations of attendance will be adjusted for speakers at the Round Rock campus - reduced rates are as follows: 500, 200, 25, & 10) - Based on ULF requested funds only (ULF request divided by anticipated attendance)","Not enough details or cost ratio is over $500:1 (0)","Potential for a high cost to audience ratio (up to  $500:1) (1)","Potential to reach a moderate cost to audience ratio (up to $100:1) (2)","Potential to reach a low cost to audience ratio (up to $15:1) (3)","Potential to reach an exceptional cost to audience ratio ($5:1 or better) (4)"]
[null,"Potential to Reach a Community/External Audience","Not enough details provided to determine community involvement (0)","No explicit intention to have community members in attendance (1)","Intended invitation to have community members attend (2)","Clear (but not explicit)expectation to have community members in attendance (3)","Explicit expectation to recruit and have community members in attendance (4)"]
["Topic/Speaker Involvement (31.25%)"]
[null,"Direct Involvment of  the University Community in Scholarly Dialogue during the program (e.g., activities including students/faculty/staff)","Not enough details provided to dertermine involvement (0)","Incomplete plans include optional dialog related to speaker  (1)","Plans include include scholarly dialog involvement with select subset of attendees (2)","Generalized plans for how attendees will be engaged in related scholarly dialog (3)","Explicit plans detailing how all student/faculty/staff attendees will be engaged in related scholarly dialog (4)"]
[null,"Direct Speaker Involvement with Scholarly Dialog during program (e.g., activities including the speaker)","Not enough details provided to dertermine speaker involvement (0)","Speaker will provide content used for follow-up dialog, but will not directly participate (1)","Speaker will participate in dialog with only a subset of the full audience (e.g., in a class at a later date) (2)","Speaker will be actively involved in dialog with some of the audience members present (e.g., audience can listen in during an active  Q&A, but questions are restricted to select partcipants) (3)","Provided plans explictly articulate that the Speaker will be actively involved in dialog with all audience members present (4)"]
[null,"Plans for Dialogue/Reflection beyond the Presentation/Q&A (e.g., could involve classes, student organizations, faculty meetings, etc.)","Not enough details provided to dertermine plans (0)","Vague or no clear plan for additional scholarly activities beyond lecture / Q&A (1)","Limited or generic plans for additional scholarly dialog activities beyond lecture / Q&A (2)","Plans provided for additional scholarly dialog through follow-up activities beyond lecture /Q&A (3)","Explicit plans detailing how additional activities related to lecture will be integrated beyond the proposed experience for continued dialog (4)"]
[null,"Clear Connection on How Event will Advance University's Diversity Mission","No connections provided (0)","One connection on how event will advance mission (1)","Two connections on how the event will advance mission (2)","Three clear connections on how the event will advance mission (3)","More than Three, explicit connections (4)"]
[null,"National/International Accomplishments of Speaker provided in Biography","Not enough details provided to determine accomplishments (0)","Established local accomplishments (1)","Established regional accomplishments (2)","Established national accomplishments (3)","Established international accomplishments (4)"]
["Event Logistics (18.75%)"]
[null,"Established Contact with Speaker","None (0)",null,"Limited - contact details available, but not yet connected (1)",null,"Active communication lines established (2)"]
[null,"Tentative Commitment by Speaker","None (0)",null,"Tentative (1)",null,"Speaker has committed to the dates (2)"]
[null,"Comprehensive Description of Event Planning","No description of event provided (0)","Incomplete description of event (1)","Complete but vague description of event (2)","Generalized description of all event details including scholarly dialog planning (3)","High quality and thorough details provided to ensure feasibility of event (4)"]
[null,"Comprehensive Description of Marketing Plan","No description of marketing provided (0)","Marketing plan has issues that may cause potential problems with plan feasibility (1)","Limited or single strategy marketing plan (2)","Generalized but broad marketing plan (3)","Multifaceted and detailed plan to offer marketing to intended diverse audience through multiple means (4)"]
["Collaboration/Budget (25%)"]
[null,"Collaboration Across University Units (e.g., activities such as but not limited to: involvement of classes, in kind services, promotion, marketing, organization/planning, building audience)","No active collaboration (0)","Lecture-related activities shared within a single program / department / organization (1)","Lecture-related activities shared across at least two programs / organizations (may be within same department) (2)","Lecture-related activities shared across at least two separate departments / organizations (3)","Lecture-related activites shared across at least two colleges (4)"]
[null,"Joint Sponsorship","Sole sponsorship from University Lecture Series Committee (ULSC) (0)","One sponsor beyond ULSC (1)","Two sponsors beyond ULSC (2)","Three sponsors beyond ULSC (3)","Four or more sponsors beyond ULSC (4)"]
[null,"Commitment for Shared Funding","No commitment for shared funding (0)","Shared funding covers 1-15% of total budget (1)","Shared funding covers 16-30% of total budget (2)","Shared funding covers 31-50% of total budget (3)","Shared funding covers 51% or more of total budget (4)"]
[null,"Budget Justification","No budget justification provided (0)","General justification provided, but missing elements (1)","General justification provided for all needed funds (2)","Adequate justification provided for all needed funds (3)","Detailed and clearly articulated budget justification to support all needed expences provided (4)"]
[]
[null,"Earned Score",{"$f":"SUM(H4:H23)","v":0},"(x 1.5625 weight)",null,null,"Total Score",{"$f":"C25*1.5625","v":0}]
[]
["Rubric score totals will be listed in ranked order. The committee will recommend as many proposals judged to merit funding as the budget allows, starting with the top-ranked proposal and progressing through the ranked list. Proposals must follow articulated guidelines on formatting and length as well as earn a minimum average of 70 points weighted score per reviewer to be considered for funding."]